If Damascus - or the Kurds - secures the last stretch of Syria-Turkey border it's game over for Ankara's influence in Syria
Who
is the supreme profiteer of the Russia-Turkey drama? No question: it’s
the Empire of Chaos. A desperate Ankara increasingly depends on NATO’s
embrace.
In
the crucial Pipelineistan arena, the Turkish Stream project has been
suspended (but not canceled). Eurasia integration – the key 21st century
project for both China and Russia – is severely hampered.
Meanwhile,
what passes for the Obama administration’s “strategy” is more slippery
than a Japanese eel. US Think Tank land interprets it as an “effort” to
“de-conflict the battlefield” even as the main NATO planks acting in
Syria (US, UK, France, Germany, plus Turkey) gear up for an alleged
“large offensive” against Islamic State (ISIS). “Alleged” because the
whole op involves prime shadow play. And “de-conflict” could rather mean
“re-conflict.”
It’s no wonder
President Putin interpreted Sultan Erdogan’s downing of the Russian
Su-24 as supremely illogical. Reasons, of course, include the Russian
Air Force’s pounding of the Turkmen – Ankara’s fifth column in northern
Syria. And the relentless Russian assault on the stolen Syrian oil
racket, which involves collusion between some pretty prominent Turkish
figures and ISIS.
It gets even more
illogical when we look at the crucial energy sphere. Ankara depends at a
rate of 27 percent on oil, and 35 percent on natural gas. Last year,
Turkey bought 55 percent of its natural gas from Russia, and 18 percent
from Iran.
Because of its manifold
infrastructure problems, Iran simply won’t be a strong competitor to
Gazprom for supplying natural gas to Turkey – and Europe – anytime soon.
Assuming it will be restarted in the future, Turkish Stream would be a
very good deal for both Turkey and central and southern Europe.
Spin me a coalition
The
current shadow play – which includes the deployment of US Special
Forces to northern Syria – opens the possibility that Turks and
Americans are about to launch a major offensive to expel Islamic State
from the crucial Jarabulus crossroads. Erdogan’s pretext is well known:
to block by any means the attempt by YPG Syrian Kurds to unite their
three cantons in northern Syria. In this corridor, Erdogan wants to
install a dodgy, hazy bunch of Turkmen – his proxies – mixed with
unspecified Sunni “moderate rebels,” keeping all lines of communication
(and smuggling) with Turkey open.
Syrian
Kurds, on the other hand, want to get there first. With American air
support. And with Russian air support. This is one of the few things
Team Obama and the Kremlin do agree on in Syria – to the absolute
despair of the Sultan. The inside word from Ankara is that Turkey would
be ready for a ground push on Jarabulus but only under American cover.
Quite absurd, considering Washington and Ankara hardly are looking for
the same endgame.
Meanwhile,
discussing Syria in Moscow, US Secretary of State John Kerry was forced
to agree, on the record, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
that “the Syrian people,” via elections, must themselves decide the
future of Assad. So even the Obama administration now seems to convey
the impression “Assad must go” may be six feet under.
Not
so fast. Shadow play firmly remains part of the equation. After all,
the famous Top Ten Terrorist List now being haggled upon by all players
must be approved by… Turkey and Saudi Arabia, who continue to weaponize
all manner of desert snakes, as long as they hiss “Assad must go.”
Into
this snake pit crawls the joke of the holiday season; the 34-nation,
Riyadh-led anti-terrorism coalition “from all over the Islamic world.”
The perpetrator of the war on Yemen, Deputy Crown Prince and Defense
Minister Mohammed bin Salman, even pledged this hazy new racket to “stop
the flow of funds” to terrorists. As if the House of Saud would
decapitate their own, indigenous wacko imams and pious, wealthy
“financiers.”
This “coalition” inbuilt
in the already existing, US-led, monstrously ineffectual Coalition of
the Dodgy Opportunists (CDO) is undiluted spin. Saudi Arabia and the
United Arab Emirates (UAE) have done absolutely nothing against ISIS
since summer. They’d rather merrily bomb Yemen. Their “armies” are
mercenary-infested. No mercenaries, no Saudi army. Pakistan and Egypt do
have armies, but they are consumed by dire local problems and would not
relocate troops to the “Syraq” quagmire even if bribed by a mountain of
petrodollars.
With this spin,
concocted by their savvy Edelman lobbyists, Riyadh believes it can
change the subject from how it’s trying hard to break up Syria.
A
breakdown of Syria’s population, including the masses of refugees,
would yield something like 14 percent Alawite Shi’ites, 5 percent
Christians, 3 percent Druze, 1 percent twelver Shi’ites, 10 percent
Kurds – the absolute majority leftist - and around 40 percent Sunnis,
mostly secular and many of them leftists, not to mention comfortably
linked to the Damascus and Aleppo business elite, that is, accommodated
with the government for generations.
Riyadh’s
– and Ankara’s - belief that a small bunch of Salafi-jihadist, from
whatever persuasion, would be able to disrupt such a complex balance,
not to mention rule a whole nation, does defy any logical explanation.
The break for the border
So
everything now hinges on the break for the border. Syrian Kurds have
been loudly announcing something along the lines that “Real Kurds go to
Jarabulus.” Jarabulus is, in a nutshell, Turkey’s last stand in Syria
(the Russian Air Force has all but exterminated the Turkmen fight column
in northern Latakia).
Imagine a
Kurdish unification corridor – running from Afrin to the rest of Rojava.
This means Turkey cut off from Syria; crucially, the end of the Jihadi
Highway; the end of Turkish secret services offering lavish logistical
support for Daesh, from Big Macs to holidays in Turkey; the end of the
Syrian stolen oil Daesh Highway. Not to mention the YPG – allied with
the PKK – controlling a semi-autonomous province with the status of a
proto-state.
Make no mistake: the
Sultan will go no holds barred to prevent it. ISIS was never an
“existential threat” to Ankara. On the contrary; it was always a very
useful indirect “ally.” Ankara will continue to plug the myth that the
road to Daesh’s defeat goes through Assad regime change.
Russia
exposed the bluff. Yet the lame duck Obama administration is still
uncertain; should we use Erdogan even as he recklessly tries to pit NATO
directly against Russia? Or should we dump him? The answer lies in who,
and how, wins the break for the border.
The
statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
No comments:
Post a Comment